<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Online Marketing Blog - Latest Comments in Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/</link><description>TopRank's online marketing blog on the intersection of social media, digital PR, content, influence and search engine marketing.  </description><atom:link href="https://toprankblog.disqus.com/top_seo_blogs_by_link_popularity/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:11:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How I wish my blog will be included in this list a year from now... I think everything is possible if we continue the hard work in promotion..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jun Valasek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:11:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129034</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Michael, I think the inconsistencies with link data has to be taken with a relative grain of salt just like we do with the search volume numbers given by keyword research tools.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Over time, these sorts of measurements can provide insight, but a one time snapshot is pretty much useless.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee Odden</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:05:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amazing numbers, indeed! I guess I'll have to work on raising my 12K score a bit, maybe doubling it over the next year or so.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Keegan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:41:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Lee,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Haven't crawled your site in awhile, good to see some nice posts waiting to be consumed!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These link popularity contests has stirred up quite an uproar with Australian bloggers as neither Google (using "link:"), Yahoo (using Yahoo! Site Explorer) or MSN (using "link:") give reliable results, the number of inbound links varies enormously. What are you thoughts on the inconsistency of reported links?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers. :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Visser</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 05:32:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those are some massive numbers.  It give me something to shoot for with my paltry 9k links, according to Site Explorer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Bartholme</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:42:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting...I suspect one reason Aaron Wall's SEOBook site is on top is the number of affiliates gunning for a commission on a sale.  Just look around and see how many Blogs about Blogging, SEO, SEM, etc. have an affiliate link back to him on their sidebar (which means it shows up in every permalinked post in many cases).  Is there a backlink counting tool that counts the number of unique domains (not URLs) that link to a particular URL?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zen Zoomie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:30:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a quite interesting comparison. So Aaron Wall is on top, and his just one. He wrote a Book, but not any book. The SEOBook. Ok, I agree, links mean that they are all worthy, but can you quantify and say that if Aaron Wall's SEOBook is 4 times larger than SERoundtable with 403,000 links, the SEOBook is 4 times better or 4 times more appropriate? Probably not. What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129028</link><description>&lt;p&gt;More information that i will put to use. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:33:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129027</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting post but makes me think if all those links really relevant to the blog. SEOBook's links might be just because the affiliate links.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Congrats to those blogs that made it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Teejay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 18:34:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My links have to be earned, Lee.  Even I have to earn them.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@Michael_Martinez</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:10:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129025</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's funny you put it that way Michael as I've noticed that many of the links Yahoo detects are not really links at all. For example, when one site "borrows" another site's image, Yahoo site explorer sees that as a link.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Am not sure if you caught it, but the reason I did this post was because of OMB's exclusion from Rand's list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, let's see that 100k links put into practice. I'd like to see if you can really do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee Odden</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:04:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So if I use my personal network to link to SEO Theory and get 100,000+ links overnight, will that count?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What about all the RSS feed scraper sites that link to me?  If I seed those feeds with links to SEO Theory, will they count?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Link popularity means nothing.  It's a number.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@Michael_Martinez</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:48:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good to see your right in the prime spot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Schawbel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:15:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Dave, you've been added!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee Odden</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:04:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;me :)&lt;br&gt;Inlinks (&lt;a href="https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=www.davidnaylor.co.uk&amp;amp;bwm=i&amp;amp;bwmf=s&amp;amp;bwmo=d&amp;amp;searchbwm=Explore+URL" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=www.davidnaylor.co.uk&amp;amp;bwm=i&amp;amp;bwmf=s&amp;amp;bwmo=d&amp;amp;searchbwm=Explore+URL"&gt;134,633&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DaveN</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:00:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129020</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, Lee...is an interesting post that will definitely help me with some link building.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Hartzer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:28:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129019</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm so glad you made the point that visitors' first reaction to a page has to satisfy - just driving traffic with huge link numbers is pointless unless it's traffic that's interested in your content.&lt;br&gt;thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Will Rowan&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will Rowan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 04:23:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top SEO Blogs by Link Popularity</title><link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/07/top-seo-blogs-by-link-popularity/#comment-17129018</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Quite an accomplishment, congratulations are in order.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JLH</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:13:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>